Pete Eyre, co-founder of CopBlock.org, recaps various abuses by school resource officers that are placed in your children’s schools for their “protection”. What is more apparent, is that the children are being trained to behave in a reactionary way to authority with no questions asked.
Schools As PrisonsPublished On January 6, 2014 | By Pete Eyre | Videos
To entrust the government with the power of determining the education which our children receive is entrusting our servant with the power to be our master.
– David Nasaw
Police In Schools
In recent years, the number of so-called school resource officers has ballooned.
Schools are supposed to be a place for kids to learn. To be challenged and to grow. Yet if one looks closer at the roots of the school system, it becomes clear that that institution puts a higher premium on conformity, on a student who consumes and regurgitates what they’re told, based more and more often on criteria set by bureaucrats in DC.
It’s costly and difficult to control a population physically, through use of arms.
Key to the perpetuation and consolidation of political power is to control the mind.
For more background on how this situation was arrived at, see the excellent video “The American Way” and check into the writings of John Taylor Gatto
Today there are over 10,000 school liaison employees. Some say this development has transitioned schools into correctional facilities.
And while the stated intention of creating a safe environment is admirable – as is true for cops outside of school walls, the incentive for those within the school walls is not to serve and protect, but to target those who disobey.
When the only tool had is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Such are the incentives of a coercive monopoly.
Introduce that mindset into an environment with ridiculous zero tolerance policies, and you have a bad combination.
In Texas, where school liaison employees annually write over 100,000 citations, the head of the supreme court Wallace Jefferson, noted, “We are criminalizing our children for non-violent offenses.”
Police are trained to escalate situations until compliance is gained.
In Stockton, California, school liaison employee Frank Gordo sat down to have a conversation with a 5yr old boy. After Gordo put his hand on the boy’s hand, the boy pushed Gordo’s hand away and kicked him in the knee. Gordo responded by zip-tying the boy for over an hour and charging him with battery.
If you did that to a 5yo child would that be permissible?
In Washington DC, police liaison employee Bailey, upset at a verbal response from a 10-year-old, grabbed the student by the back of his head and slammed it off the table. The student reported the incident to his teacher, but was told she couldn’t act as it involved a police employee. Later that day, when the boy was brought to the hospital by his mom after complaining of a a headache and sleepiness, it was discovered that he had had a concussion.
In Manchester NH, school liaison employee Darren Murphy slammed a students head off a cafeteria table for swearing. There too – school administrators sided with the aggressor – Murphy faced no repercussions and was back to ‘keeping the school safe’ the very next day.
In Mississippi, a girl with sleep apnea feel asleep when reading a book in class. She was eventually asked to leave. When in the hall on the phone with her mom someone swiped at her backpack. The girl didn’t turn around, but said “leave me alone.” The person behind her was school liaison employee Chris Bryant, who shoved her face-first into a filing cabinet then handcuffed her. After the girl threw up from the trauma, she was brought to a children’s hospital and had her arm immobilized.
Police are actively targeting parents who’s kids are said to be truant. After all, time spent in government schools is crucial to the indoctrination of the next generation.
In Palm Beach, FL parents of such students may be caged up to two months and face ransoms of thousands of dollars.
In Orange County, California, parents of students who weren’t present as dictated face up to a year in a cage. A recent “truancy sweep” involved at least seven agencies, including a gang reduction intervention team.
But hey – it’s for their own good right?
The men and women still pretending that the disastrous war on some substances is feasible, have subjected students to their erroneous ways.
In Goose Creek, South Carolina police conducted a raid under the pretense of seizing drugs. They had coordinated with school administers ahead of time. Over a hundred students in the hall were ordered on the floor. Over a dozen were handcuffed. Some had guns pointed at their heads. No drugs were found. And no apologies were issued.
In Indiana an 11year old boy who had cannabis on his person was bitten by a police dog. The cannabis was placed there by the dogs handler, as part of a simulated raid. is that the kind of thing you want your kid to be desensitized about? A raid? Is a world where that is commonplace ideal?
Would you let me come around your kid with a dog trained to be aggressive and think it alright if I planted drugs on them and them your child to be chill while I led the dog around them?
The act is no different if the handler happens to wear a badge.
And, the LAPD, the same outfit that introduced SWAT units started the practice of placing undercover police employees are in schools posing as students. Their goal? To bust kids selling substances deemed illicit.
This includes one Florida student who, though he didn’t use cannabis himself, procured some and gave it for free to a female he fell in love with. Turns out, she was a cop. In the end, he, and 30 others, were arrested.
In the post-9/11 security theater, school resource officers like to see themselves as being on the front lines.
Organizations now exist to capitalize on this sector of the police state. One – the National Association of School Resource Officers, offers training, and lists as the first presentation item – “Preparation for International and Domestic Terrorism”
It should be clear – at least to those who haven’t just been exposed to government education – just who are the real terrorists.
As if taking a cue from our friends at fusion centers, a database called inBloom is being implemented in school districts.
The software tracks over 400 metrics about each student. But don’t worry, they promise that the information won’t be shared.
And administrators one school – which distributed laptops to students – spied on over 40 students through the built-in camera.
So what are some solutions?
I know some will say, “but it’s important that these kids be in school!” but who’s kids are these? The states? A faceless entity answerable to no one? Are all proclamations made by such folks legitimate?
What if parents were told that their children had to be present in school for 9 hours a day? or 11 hours a day?
What if parents were told that, to mitigate distractions during the schoolyear, their children would be taken and placed in government-run boarding houses?
What if parents were told that their kids had to participate in a Youth Service program to show their allegiance?
If you have kids and you are a firearm owners, consider this question:
If asked, would you turn over your guns to a government agent for a third of the day? I’d guess not, yet are you current willing to hand-off something even more important – your kids, and their minds – to the same people?
Education doesn’t just happen in a building called a school. And in fact, the information pushed there is patently full of omissions and misinformation to fit the statist quo.
As John Holt said, compulsory schooling, compulsory learning – is a tyranny and a crime against the human mind and spirit. Let all those escape it who can, any way they can.
If you have kids, consider homeschooling, or better yet, unschooling.
And if you’re not a fan of the police state and the incursion of police employees into schools, learn about peaceful parenting.
This article posted to LewRockwell.com on December 18th 2013 by Glenn Jacobs touches on a few of his reservations and concerns about the digital crypto-currency Bitcoin.
I personally have lost Bitcoin, and have been unable to recover them as of yet, 6 months later. Whether the problem is user error, or software or hardware is still undetermined. With a decentralized style of transmission and storage it puts a lot of responsibility on the user to hold onto their coin and keep it safe from prying eyes or hands.
I know many of individuals who have had nothing but a positive experience with Bitcoin and many who have had similar situations as my own. Either way this new technology comes with a great deal of risk and as the early adopters have shown a potential for a large of reward.
By Glenn Jacobs
December 18, 2013
Within the liberty community, there is a raging debate about the merits and future of Bitcoin. Because Bitcoin has been by far the best investment of this decade, that debate is quickly making its way into the mainstream as well.
Many smart folks whom I like and respect are enormous proponents of this digital currency. Some of them go so far as to say that Bitcoin will fundamentally break the power of the State by undermining its ability to control money. This a laudable goal indeed. Bitcoin is also the first exposure that many people have had to the idea of competing currencies, which is a welcome development.
Nevertheless, I have some serious reservations and concerns about Bitcoin.
While digital currencies like Bitcoin may play a role in a future monetary system, I still tend to believe that gold and silver will reemerge as the dominate forms of money, and it is the precious metals which will eventually overwhelm and supplant government issued fiat currencies.
First of all, as the hard money camp points out, money, i.e. a society’s medium of exchange, emerges on the market. It is not introduced from the top-down, but comes forth from the bottom-up. No one “invents” money, not even governments. Throughout history, governments have taken control of the currency, and then gradually weaned them off of their precious metal backing.
When presented with this argument, Bitcoin supporters claim that the first people to start using gold and silver as money did indeed introduce them into the market. The problem with this argument is that no one planned on whatever commodity being used as money. Folks simply begin trading this particular item because that good happened to be the one that everyone else would accept. It was the society’s most marketable commodity.
Bitcoin supporters claim that its value is derived from the fact that Bitcoin can be exchanged. In other words, it is a form of money, which is what makes it valuable. Again, this argument puts the cart before the horse. Gold and silver became money because of their value as commodities, not the other way around.
We often hear that gold and silver have intrinsic value. This statement is false. Austrian economics teaches us that value is subjective. Nothing has intrinsic value. Goods only have the value that individuals assign to them.
Nevertheless, human beings have desired the precious metals for thousands of years. This track record proves that the metals have value in and of themselves. Conversely, what gives Bitcoin its value? I assert that folks value Bitcoin because it is not the Dollar or the Euro or the Yen. Unlike gold and silver, folks desire Bitcoin because of what it isn’t, not because of what it is.
This brings us to a very important question: if the precious metals were actually allowed to compete in the market as money, would there even be a need for something like Bitcoin?
There is another concern about Bitcoin that gnaws at me. Control of money is the State’s most important tool for maintaining power. Controlling money allows governments to engineer society, rewarding the politically connected while keeping the underclass content. It gives government the ability to promote the illusion that there is such as thing as a free lunch, and that the State is the fountainhead from which all good things flow. Thus, governments will crush anything that undermines their control over money. Absolutely no competition in this area is allowed.
Of course, hard money–gold and silver–is the ultimate competitor to the State’s fiat currencies. For this reason, Western governments* have long exhibited outright hostility to the metals:
- •From 1933 until 1975, it was illegal for US citizens to own gold bullion.
- •The world’s governments and central banks actively manipulate the price of gold through market interventions like the now defunct London Gold Pool.
- •Officials such as Ben Bernanke ridicule gold, saying that central banks hold it is reserve not because gold is money, but as a matter of “tradition.”
- •In the US, gold and silver are taxed at prohibitive rates compared to other investments.
If you need any more evidence of the government’s hatred and fear of the precious metals, just read what U.S. Attorney Anne M. Tompkins had to say during Bernard von NotHaus’s counterfeiting trial. She described the Liberty Dollar–a privately issued currency backed by precious metals–as “a unique form of domestic terrorism” that is attempting “to undermine the legitimate currency of this country.”
On the other hand, government and central bank officials have given Bitcoin lukewarm approval. Ahead of congressional hearings into Bitcoin, Bernanke wrote a letter to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs saying that digital currencies such as Bitcoin “may hold long-term promise, particularly if the innovations promote a faster, more secure and more efficient payment system.” During the hearings, the Department of Justice stated that Bitcoins can be “legal means of exchange”
Perhaps it’s my conspiratorial side, but something smells fishy here. If Bitcoin is as dangerous to the State as its proponents in the liberty movement claim, why isn’t the State already moving to crush it?
All this excitement about Bitcoin may divert interest away the precious metals, which is probably exactly what the State wants. Meanwhile, all the money that could potential flow into Bitcoin is money that will not flow into the precious metals, meaning that fewer folks will own the ultimate money.
While I wish Bitcoin and its supporters success, and I love the idea of competing currencies, I fear that Bitcoin will act as a foil for the real once-and-future money–gold and silver.
*While the Chinese government appears more sympathetic to gold, many (including myself) suspect that the goal of the Chinese is to introduce a gold-backed currency to rival the dollar. The Chinese are not goldbugs. They recognize the importance of issuing the world’s reserve currency in positioning themselves as a new superpower.
Talk radio YOU control!
Is it a conservative talk show? No.
Is it a liberal talk show? No.
What Free Talk Live is, is a Pro-Freedom call in show that will discuss any issue YOU want to talk about.
Go to the Free Talk Live archives to access all of their content for free!
If you have a Reddit account you can submit show prep content that you think is important. The submitted content can be voted up or down by other listeners like you.
Free Talk Live is supported by listeners like you via their AMP program (Advertise, Market, Promote) to help them spread the message of liberty far and wide. It is thanks to this program that they can offer more to their listeners such as the 24/7 stream, live webcam, upgraded the quality of the audio and even launching a satellite channel.
Police are put on check by individuals who decided to make a simple phone call to ask for accountability. Charges against Carlos Miller and Taylor Hardy have been dropped. Below is the article written by Carlos Miller from his blog Photography Is Not A Crime.
Boston PD Folds After Doubling-Down; Withdraws Felony Complaint Against PINAC
The Boston Police Department agreed to withdraw the felony complaints against myself and PINAC associate Taylor Hardy on the condition that readers stop flooding their phone lines with calls demanding that they withdraw the complaints.
As if I would have any say in that.
But to paraphrase my attorney: Please. Stop. Calling. They get the message.
In other words, we did it. We won. We took their intimidation tactics and threw them right back in their face. Multiple times on multiple lines despite the threat of multiple crimes they threatened to charge us with.
We showed them the power of the people. The force of the First Amendment. The clout that can be created after a quick call to action that enabled us to raise $4,200 in 36 hours to retain one of the most experienced attorneys in Boston.
This is what attorney David Duncan had to say:
“I am happy we were able to resolve this to Carlos’ and Taylor’s satisfaction, with criminal charge applications dropped by BPD, so that Carlos and Taylor can continue their work fighting for lawfulness, openness and transparency in police work across the country. Going forward they will not let up on their vigorous defense of citizen freedom. They understand that the law in Massachusetts is that they have to tell people if they are recording a conversation, and they have assured BPD that they will always announce that they are recording when asking for recorded comments, which has always been their practice.”
Read the official statement from police at the bottom of this article.
Besides their pleas that we stop calling, they also requested that Hardy remove the video from Youtube that led to the felony complaints against us; a 30-second recorded conversation between himself and spokeswoman Angelene Richardson where he was seeking comment on another video that was going viral.
But Hardy had already removed the video because it contained absolutely no journalistic substance.
Police also asked that Hardy and anybody else associated with PINAC to inform police if they are recording them during a telephone conversation, but that is something we’ve always done.
The only reason Hardy did not do so this time was because of a technical mishap. He was using his iPad to record, but in the seconds before he informed her, he had clicked on the Safari app to bring up my story, which caused the recorder to turn off.
They also asked that I remove the phone number to Detective Nick Moore from the article in which I cut and pasted his email to me, posted below, because he was also getting slammed with phone calls.
So I agreed to remove it, even though I left his email in the article, because it reveals just how disingenuous police officers can be.Mr. Miller,Can you please contact me at your convenience at my office, xxx-xxx-xxxx. I realize that you do not trust the police and that is fine but I assure you I am not trying to jam you up. I just wish to have a cordial conversation with you and clear the air about a few things. Please do not post my office number or email to your website as I have numerous victims of serious crimes who contact me on a daily basis and It would not be fair to them or me if my voicemail box is full and they cannot get ahold of me.My supervisors and the District Attorney’s office are aware of this request but I assure you that the conversation will just be me and you, not recorded, and again, Im not trying trap you into anything incriminating. As I relayed to Mr. Hardy I try to give everyone involved in my investigations the benefit of the doubt and speaking with you about this hopefully will accomplish that. Thank you.Detective MooreBoston Police Department
Perhaps it was naive of me, but when I received the email, I called him immediately because I wanted to do what I could to help resolve the situation with Hardy, who had received a complaint of felony wiretapping.
It wasn’t until several minutes into our conversation after I had apparently admitted to posting the statement below, that he informed me I would be facing a complaint of witness intimidation.
I have no regrets because I always stand by what I write, but it did put me into an inconvenient situation where I was suddenly facing ten years in prison.
During that conversation, Moore acknowledged that the call floods to Richardson were getting annoying, so he was hoping to put a stop to them by not only filing a complaint against me for witness intimidation, but threatening to do the same to anybody else if they continued to call her.
But that plan backfired on him.
PINAC readers not only continued to call Richardson’s line, but Moore’s line as well. Day in and day out. Hour after hour. Minute after minute.
And that was only part of their problem.
The other problem were the editorials, articles and statements from news sites, journalism organizations and law blogs that not only criticized the Boston Police Department for its intimidating tactics, but further spread the phone numbers to new readers, who wasted no time in calling.
It got to the point that as soon as you mentioned the word, “blogger,” you were immediately told to email them, then hung up on, as you can see on the comment below from Popehat.
And further increasing their problems was the introduction of a high-profile lawyer from one of Boston’s most prestigious law firms, who gave us a discounted rate because of our connection to the Digital Media Law Project.
But that still meant shelling $2,000 up front, which was more than three times the amount of what other attorneys were charging.
But it was money well spent.
Only hours after we had retained Duncan, he received a call from a police attorney asking to mediate, which is why Thursday’s hearing was postponed.
And as the attorneys mediated, the call floods continued, and the media exposure increased.
And there was pretty much nothing left for them to do but to lay their fiddle down because they knew they had been beat.
It’s been a stressful two weeks to say the least. They came at us strong and stupid, but we came back at them stronger and smarter, building up several fronts, thanks to the vast network of supporters we have.
We were prepared to go the distance. And we had several strategies in place depending on their next move. It didn’t take long for them to realize they had seriously underestimated us.
I can’t thank you guys enough for donating as much as you did on such a short notice. And for making those calls. And for spreading the stories. And for launching and signing that petition. And for calling the media.
And a big thanks to our network up in Boston, including the Digital Media Law Project for hooking us up with Duncan as well as Paul Weiskel and Antonio Buehler who were ready to photograph and live stream the hearing on Friday if the complaint did not get withdrawn as well as those of you who offered us a place to stay if we ended up flying up there as well as those of you who were ready to begin making public records requests within the police department if the case proceeded to trial.
This was, without a doubt, a community effort. But it had to be done because they were trying to create a chilling effect on free speech towards government accountability, which would have affected us all.
I plan to reinvest the remaining $2,200 in PINAC, perhaps in technical and design upgrades, merchandising, Jeff Gray’s still pending case against the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office or maybe just hold on to it until the next legal issue considering we are now prime targets for police agencies throughout the country.
But hopefully they will think twice before picking a fight because we not only get smarter after each victory, we get more organized.
PINAC may have started out as a scrappy one-man blog from Miami on a mission to beat a single court case, but there are now several of us onboard, each of us unafraid to step into the ring if we must. And we have a huge support network that expands all corners of this country and beyond willing to go the distance with us.
Hardy, a 25-year-old journalism student, who has learned more from this experience than he has in any of his classes, had the following to say:
The possibility of facing 15 combined years in prison, in another state that you have never been to, and have no idea how the system works, was the most alarming factor in this case. I want to thank ALL of you, because If not for your support, calls, emails(petitioning the government) and donations, we would not have been able to beat them at their own game. I also want to thank our attorney, David Duncan, who worked as our point of contact in Boston mediating the case and working with Carlos (which we know is hard ). It may not be a win in court of law, but at least it’s a win in our eyes. As I step deeper into the world of government transparency, I know I have to take measures to ensure these types of tactics can’t be used against us again. #PINACSTRONG
In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and across America you have the right to record video and audio of public officials in a public place. Yet, when exercising that right you can be victimized verbally or physically by police. This is not a new trend, many individuals have been kidnapped and caged for simply recording.
But what can be said about bringing charges on individuals who want to bring transparency to government? Are journalists really a threat? Perhaps when the control of information is in the hands of the public rather than the central scrutinizer, it is.
What can only be conceived of as an effort to discourage individuals from facilitating police accountability, the Boston Police Department has brought charges on Carlos Miller (Photography Is Not A Crime) and Taylor Hardy.
Maybe we can call or email Richardson
to persuade her to drop the charges against Hardy considering she
should assume all her conversations with reporters are on the record
unless otherwise stated. Her listed number is (617) 343-4520.
So because of a suggested call flood to a public servant to weigh in on Taylors wiretapping charge, Carlos has been charged with Witness Intimidation. And here is a threat against anyone else who decided to call Richardson;
Detective Nick Moore also assured me he would do the same to any PINAC readers if they continue to contact departmental spokeswoman Angelene Richardson as they have been doing since yesterday.
“I can go and get warrants for every person who called her,” he said during a telephone conversation earlier this evening. “It’s an annoyance. It’s an act of intimidation.”
The scheduled hearing for Nov. 14, 2013 will be rescheduled to the 22nd of November; That gives the internet one more week to expose what the kings men are all about.
*If you want to help Carlos and Taylor you can donate to their legal fund.
How to turn statists into freedom lovers – a powerful, funny and engaging talk by Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio, recorded at the Freedom Summit 2010 in Phoenix Arizona in December 2010.
Find more of Stefan at http://www.freedomainradio.com/